Skip to content
Cyber Solutions

Identity Threat Detection and Monitoring

Find identity exposure sooner. Prioritise what matters. Track the improvement.

Identity Threat Detection and Monitoring
Discover → Prioritise → Report
Overview

Identity-related risk is rarely sitting in one system waiting to be found. It is spread across privileged accounts, service accounts, application secrets, machine identities and legacy environments, with third-party access and hybrid estates making the full picture harder to see.

The problem is not simply that controls are missing; it is that organisations cannot always answer what exists, what is exposed, and what should be fixed first. Avocado connects assessment, identity security, secrets management, audit evidence and cyber risk discovery so security teams can move from an unclear problem statement to a prioritised remediation program.

Who is this for?

You'll recognise the situation

Identity-related risk is spread across all identities — privileged accounts, service accounts, application secrets, machine identities and legacy environments, and often nobody can answer what exists, what is exposed, and what to fix first.

Third-party access and hybrid estates make the full identity picture even harder to see.

You want remediation sequenced by exposure and business context, not by the volume of findings.

You need to see whether your identity risk position is actually improving over time, not just a one-off snapshot.

What's included

From unclear identity risk to a prioritised program

Identity Exposure Discovery

Find and classify privileged accounts, exposed application secrets and control gaps.

Privileged Risk Monitoring

Improve visibility and evidence around privileged accounts, access and high-risk activity, feeding into Modern Privileged Management.

Assurance and Risk Prioritisation

Turn assessment findings, control evidence and posture reporting into a defensible security story, connected to your GRC program's risk quantification and audit evidence.

In detail

How each capability works

01

Identity Exposure Discovery

The first problem is often visibility. In hybrid and legacy estates, privileged accounts and application secrets can sit outside the clean identity lifecycle teams expect. We start with discovery and classification, then turn findings into a view of exposure that security and engineering teams can act on.

Our approach
  • Discovery of privileged human, service, machine and application accounts.
  • Scanning and triage of secrets across source repositories, pipelines, configuration stores and container images.
  • Control-gap analysis with findings classified by exposure and blast radius.
  • Assessment of applications and environments where identity-related exposure can persist.
  • Prioritisation of remediation based on risk rather than finding volume.
02

Privileged Risk Monitoring

Privileged accounts remain a critical identity risk because they can connect a foothold to material impact. This capability is about seeing and prioritising that risk, not building the controls themselves, which is Modern Privileged Management's job.

Our approach
  • Privileged account discovery and inventory across human and non-human identities, surfaced as exposure to be prioritised rather than immediately remediated.
  • Visibility into which accounts carry standing access, unmanaged credentials, or unreviewed session activity. That is the input that decides what Modern Privileged Management should tackle first.
03

Turning exposure into evidence and action

Detection only creates value when it changes a decision, and evidence only helps when the organisation can show its controls actually operate. Rather than re-running audit and risk-quantification methodology here, this capability plugs identity-specific findings directly into it.

Our approach
  • Identity findings classified and mapped into the same control evidence your GRC program already produces for auditors, executives and risk owners.
  • Identity-specific exposures, such as privileged accounts, secrets, control gaps are quantified and prioritised with the same approach used across the rest of your cyber risk program, so remediation is funded by impact, not finding volume.
  • Regular health checks and posture reporting specific to identity, so you can see whether identity risk is improving over time, not just at the point of a one-off assessment.
  • Findings integrated into your broader cyber security strategy and architecture work, rather than sitting in a standalone identity report nobody else sees.
How do we deliver it?

Discover, prioritise, integrate, report

01

Discover

Discover and classify privileged accounts, exposed secrets, and control gaps across your identity estate.

02

Prioritise

Classify findings by exposure and blast radius, not by finding volume, so remediation targets what actually matters.

03

Integrate

Connect findings to your existing GRC and privileged-access programs, so identity risk feeds decisions rather than sitting in a standalone report.

04

Report

Track posture over time with regular health checks, so you can see whether identity risk is actually improving.

Book a discovery

Book a discovery with our cyber team

Bring us the problem — privileged-account sprawl, exposed application secrets, contractor access, audit findings, or uncertainty about where identity risk sits.

What tools and technology do we use?

Discovery, analysis and quantification

Discovery and scanning across source repositories, pipelines, configuration stores and container images to find exposed secrets and privileged accounts; control-gap analysis against recognised frameworks; and the same risk assessment methodology used across our Governance, Risk and Compliance service to prioritise what's found.

What outcomes can you expect?

What you walk away with

A defensible, evidence-based picture of identity-related exposure across your estate.
High-risk gaps found earlier, with remediation focused on the issues with the greatest blast radius.
A baseline for improvement, with posture reporting that shows whether identity risk is actually going down.
Findings that plug directly into your existing privileged-access and governance programs, not a standalone report nobody else sees.
Proof · Case study

Threat and risk assessment for a leading health service provider

Read the case study
How is this engagement structured?

Need a clearer picture of where identity-related risk is concentrated? Talk to us — we'll help you find the highest-value place to start. Contact us for a tailored quote.

FAQ

Common questions

How is this different from Modern Privileged Access Management?

Identity Threat Detection and Monitoring focuses on discovering and prioritising where identity-related exposure sits across your estate. Modern Privileged Management builds and operates the ongoing controls — vaulting, rotation, session management — once that exposure is understood. In practice, these two services overlap significantly; talk to us about which is the right starting point for your situation.

What kind of identity exposure does this find?

Privileged accounts, exposed application secrets, service and machine account sprawl, and control gaps across hybrid and legacy environments — with findings classified by exposure and blast radius, not just volume.

Is this a one-off assessment or an ongoing service?

Both models are available. Discovery can be a starting-point assessment, or an ongoing program with regular health checks and posture reporting to track improvement over time.

How does risk get prioritised?

Using cyber risk profiling and threat assessment, so remediation is sequenced by business and technical impact rather than the number of findings.

Does this include compliance evidence?

Yes — assurance and evidence connects technical findings to the audit and governance evidence auditors, executives and risk owners need, aligned to recognised frameworks.

Deliver with certainty

See the identity gaps before they become impact

Talk to our cyber security specialists about finding identity exposure, prioritising what matters and building evidence into the way remediation is managed.